<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Case Against the $113.4 Million Software Upgrade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crmfyi.com/2009/10/05/the-case-against-the-1134-million-software-upgrade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crmfyi.com/2009/10/05/the-case-against-the-1134-million-software-upgrade/</link>
	<description>Good to know news, views, and stuff you can use about Salesforce.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 05:57:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WWD Weekend Reading List</title>
		<link>http://crmfyi.com/2009/10/05/the-case-against-the-1134-million-software-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-10023</link>
		<dc:creator>WWD Weekend Reading List</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crmfyi.com/?p=190#comment-10023</guid>
		<description>[...] CRM FYI: &#8220;The Case Against the $113.4 Million Software Upgrade&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CRM FYI: &#8220;The Case Against the $113.4 Million Software Upgrade&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Grosse</title>
		<link>http://crmfyi.com/2009/10/05/the-case-against-the-1134-million-software-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-9955</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Grosse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crmfyi.com/?p=190#comment-9955</guid>
		<description>Fair enough Mike.  I know the cost is passed on to each of us through subscriptions, but I&#039;d say that Salesforce.com may have one of the most sophisticated teams of IT infrastructure people around.  The fact that they&#039;re on the Salesforce payroll and not on that those 63,000 companies is a huge savings through the economy of their scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough Mike.  I know the cost is passed on to each of us through subscriptions, but I&#8217;d say that Salesforce.com may have one of the most sophisticated teams of IT infrastructure people around.  The fact that they&#8217;re on the Salesforce payroll and not on that those 63,000 companies is a huge savings through the economy of their scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://crmfyi.com/2009/10/05/the-case-against-the-1134-million-software-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-9938</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crmfyi.com/?p=190#comment-9938</guid>
		<description>Well, as much of a Salesforce zealot that I am, it is worth pointing out in all fairness:

* That $113MM has just shifted to Salesforce staff (they didn&#039;t get to be a $1B yr company giving away their service)
* Companies don&#039;t get to choose &#039;when&#039; the Salesforce upgrade occurs. The mandatory downtime is a problem with some operations.
* The companies doing on-premise upgrades likely have perpetual use licenses, which over 5 years may actually be lower than recurring annual subscriptions.


Just sayin... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as much of a Salesforce zealot that I am, it is worth pointing out in all fairness:</p>
<p>* That $113MM has just shifted to Salesforce staff (they didn&#8217;t get to be a $1B yr company giving away their service)<br />
* Companies don&#8217;t get to choose &#8216;when&#8217; the Salesforce upgrade occurs. The mandatory downtime is a problem with some operations.<br />
* The companies doing on-premise upgrades likely have perpetual use licenses, which over 5 years may actually be lower than recurring annual subscriptions.</p>
<p>Just sayin&#8230; <img src='http://crmfyi.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Barlow</title>
		<link>http://crmfyi.com/2009/10/05/the-case-against-the-1134-million-software-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-10842</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Barlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 05:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crmfyi.com/?p=190#comment-10842</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @crmfyi The Case Against the $113.4M Software Upgrade http://ow.ly/sT15 #salesforce. Great Article highlighting multi-tenancy &amp; SFDC&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @crmfyi The Case Against the $113.4M Software Upgrade <a href="http://ow.ly/sT15" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/sT15</a> #salesforce. Great Article highlighting multi-tenancy &amp; SFDC</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kingsley Joseph</title>
		<link>http://crmfyi.com/2009/10/05/the-case-against-the-1134-million-software-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-10843</link>
		<dc:creator>Kingsley Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 05:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crmfyi.com/?p=190#comment-10843</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @crmfyi The Case Against the $113.4 million Software Upgrade http://ow.ly/sT15 #salesforce&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @crmfyi The Case Against the $113.4 million Software Upgrade <a href="http://ow.ly/sT15" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/sT15</a> #salesforce</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahim Hirani</title>
		<link>http://crmfyi.com/2009/10/05/the-case-against-the-1134-million-software-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-10844</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahim Hirani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crmfyi.com/?p=190#comment-10844</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @forcedotcom: RT @crmfyi The Case Against the $113.4 million Software Upgrade http://ow.ly/sT15 #salesforce&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @forcedotcom: RT @crmfyi The Case Against the $113.4 million Software Upgrade <a href="http://ow.ly/sT15" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/sT15</a> #salesforce</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CRM Alert</title>
		<link>http://crmfyi.com/2009/10/05/the-case-against-the-1134-million-software-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-10845</link>
		<dc:creator>CRM Alert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crmfyi.com/?p=190#comment-10845</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;The Case Against the $113.4 Million Software Upgrade &#124; CRM FYI http://crmfyi.com/?p=190&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">The Case Against the $113.4 Million Software Upgrade | CRM FYI <a href="http://crmfyi.com/?p=190" rel="nofollow">http://crmfyi.com/?p=190</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garry Polmateer</title>
		<link>http://crmfyi.com/2009/10/05/the-case-against-the-1134-million-software-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-10846</link>
		<dc:creator>Garry Polmateer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crmfyi.com/?p=190#comment-10846</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT: @forcedotcom: RT @crmfyi The Case Against the $113.4 million Software Upgrade http://ow.ly/sT15 #salesforce&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT: @forcedotcom: RT @crmfyi The Case Against the $113.4 million Software Upgrade <a href="http://ow.ly/sT15" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/sT15</a> #salesforce</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Force.com</title>
		<link>http://crmfyi.com/2009/10/05/the-case-against-the-1134-million-software-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-10847</link>
		<dc:creator>Force.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crmfyi.com/?p=190#comment-10847</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @crmfyi The Case Against the $113.4 million Software Upgrade http://ow.ly/sT15 #salesforce&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @crmfyi The Case Against the $113.4 million Software Upgrade <a href="http://ow.ly/sT15" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/sT15</a> #salesforce</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Tierney</title>
		<link>http://crmfyi.com/2009/10/05/the-case-against-the-1134-million-software-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-10848</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Tierney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crmfyi.com/?p=190#comment-10848</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @spartovi: RT @CRMFYI: Just Posted: The Case Against the $113.4 million Software Upgrade http://ow.ly/sT15 #salesforce&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @spartovi: RT @CRMFYI: Just Posted: The Case Against the $113.4 million Software Upgrade <a href="http://ow.ly/sT15" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/sT15</a> #salesforce</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
